Me and Georgia O’Keeffe

by     /    April 05, 2010   

This winter I visited the Georgia O’Keeffe Abstraction exhibit at the Whitney Museum. It was a wonderfully-curated show that explored her groundbreaking beginning in abstraction, and traced its influence throughout her career. I have always loved O’Keeffe, but like most people, I am mainly familiar with her paintings of flowers and the Southwest. Until I saw this exhibit, I didn’t realize how much her work was grounded in the visual language and techniques she developed from her early abstract paintings. Now, of course, this makes perfect sense to me. Looking at her later work, I can see how her early explorations of abstraction helped her translate what she saw and experienced into a common language of form, shape, and movement.

Seeing the full range, depth, and beauty of her abstract work in person helped me better understand the importance of her style and its influence on my art. I am able to now see a clear connection to my own work. When I walked up to this painting, Series I—No. I, which I had never seen before, I was blown away by its resemblance to a piece I created from a sunflower just this summer:

Georgia O’Keeffe, Series I—No. I, 1918
Georgia O’Keeffe, Series I—No. I, 1918

@Daniel Sroka
Flow by Daniel Sroka, 2009

Even though I had never directly seen this abstract painting of hers before, I had absorbed her primary lessons in shape and form from the rest of her paintings. Without directly realizing it, she has been my mentor all along.

One other thing I find interesting is that we have reversed our approach to abstracation and nature. She started working with abstraction, and later used that knowledge to craft her vision of nature. Whereas I started creating more representational images of nature, but over time have been abstracting them down further and further. I now feel I am most successful with a photograph when the original nature of the subject disappears, and you are left with a simpler expression of its true nature, its physicality and dynamism.

read more:    Thoughts    Tags:      

Other posts you might be interested in:

Share this post

Comments on 'Me and Georgia O’Keeffe'

Angela Fehr  (April 5th, 2010):

What a neat connection between your work & O’Keefe’s! I think it’s also interesting that she started working with abstraction – in my experience most artists start with realism and become more abstract over time.

Roberta  (April 6th, 2010):

Beautiful connection to your work. I knew there was a reason I liked it so much. I like O’Keefe’s floral abstracts.

Naomi Broudo  (April 6th, 2010):

Great artists think alike! You and Georgia are definitely kindred spirits. It must have been very exciting to stand in front of this painting and feel the connection to your work.

Ron White  (April 9th, 2010):

Daniel – I too like Georgia’s abstracts and yours. I started many years ago in my Dad’s darkroom and continued until about five years ago with realistic images. I’m very thankful for the artistic flexibility that our digital age brings me and find myself enjoying more creative treatments. Also I’m drawn more and more to Macro work and find such wonderful beauty in the “simple” things. Thanks Daniel, keep up the fine work.